2020. 2. 11. 09:39ㆍ카테고리 없음
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community. You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
- [Bug fortran/48713] New: Error: invalid instruction suffix for push. Summary: Error: invalid instruction suffix for.
- Error: invalid instruction suffix for 'push' It is used every time a program does a PUSH, POP, CALL, INT, or RET opcode and the 'Address Size Override Prefix' (0x67) to the beginning of any instruction. Of: x86-16/32 RealMode Addressing (2003), The workings of IA32 real mode.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links: If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please.
If you need to reset your password,. Having a problem logging in? Please visit to clear all LQ-related cookies. Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter. For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration.
This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own. To receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. Quote: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in After trying to complile it with different options, I tried to compile a simple hello world type program, but I got exactly same type of errors. However the program complied perfectly in other 32 bit Linux machine.
Also, I successfully complied my hello world program with –m64 option in solaris machine. So, I guess its some configuration issue with that particular machine, but I couldn’t figure out what it is. Any help or suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
Fetchmail - capable server. Fetchmail (1) Name. Fetchmail - capable server. Synopsis fetchmail [option.] [mailserver.] fetchmailconf.
Disclaimer: We are a infosec video aggregator and this video is linked from an external website. The original author may be different from the user re-posting/linking it here. Please do not assume the authors to be same without verifying. Comments:. on Sun 27 Feb 2011 Great Series Vivek! I think I'm gonna check out the Buffer Overflow series next.
General comments about this series are all positive, I liked how we went through and used gdb to set breakpoints and examine the memory, it really helped me to understand what was going on. Please make more!. on Fri 04 Mar 2011 Great Video!. on Sun 13 Mar 2011 Awesome! Thank you Sir!.
on Tue 22 Mar 2011 Thank you for a comprehensive introduction to the assembly language and what goes on in the memory. I hope to find more in-depth videos from you further on.
on Sat 26 Mar 2011 Thank you for all the work you have put into these videos. They provide a solid introduction to assembly programming. on Mon 28 Mar 2011 Thank you very much for your good work. It was really helpful. on Mon 11 Apr 2011 Like everyone, I like your work, I think we need more people like you who are willing to share their knowledge, I have followed the series since the first video and I've tried all the examples, all they have worked, however, I you need to clarify something I've encountered and I'm sure many have found too, it is the execution platform, I mean: If you run an assembly code on a 32 bit, works perfectly using functions like popl, movl, leal, pushl, etc.
But if you use a 64-bit platform, you can still use some registers and ecx, ebx, etc. And functions as movl, leal, etc. With some success, but functions like popl%eXX, pushl%eXX doesn't work at all. And worse, operations such as those shown in this video, obtaining a value as a function of the memory location of the EBX register, to run this example I changed the shape functions by popq, pushq, movq, addq, etc, and the registers by%rsp,%rsb,%rax,%rbx, etc. Also, get a value from the memory location of the EBX/RBX the values must be multiplied by two (64 bits platform after all), for this reason the instructions in the function have changed to the following: movq $4,%rax movq $1,%rbx movq 16(%rbp),%rcx movq 24(%rbp),%rdx int $0x80 I hope that if someone is in a similar situation trying the exercises, this review will be helpful. Again, thank you for your wonderful work Vivek, I hope to see many more videos made by you on Hacking.
Greetings. on Tue 12 Apr 2011 Fantastic! Thank you - been really helpful. on Mon 18 Apr 2011 Vivek, Thank you so much. I am very much enjoying these videos! Please continue to post great quality content on assembly / hacking:) One question: Do you plan on covering calls to libc functions (like printf) from asm?
I think you mentioned that in one of the earlier videos but I do not recall seeing that in this primer series. on Wed 27 Apr 2011 hi vivek realy very good tutorial but i dont understand the indirect addressing using registers please can u describe in more detail about indirect addressing.
on Sat 30 Apr 2011 Hi Vivek, excellent series thank you so much! I reckon its time for a coffee and then onto Buffer Overflow Series.
Thanks. on Sat 30 Apr 2011 Excellent video series Vivek! Really appreciate you taken your time to assemble this primer for us! Thank you alot.
Hannes : Error Invalid Instruction Suffix For Push Ghdl For Mac Os
Now on with the Buffer Overflow. =). on Sat 14 May 2011 Thank you so much Vivek for the time and effort it took you to create this series of very useful videos! For those who are new to assembly and really need to get the basics down for proper reverse engineering efforts, this series should help quite a bit.
I plan to pass on the 'group' URL for this series to all of my junior co-workers. Thanks again!!. on Mon 16 May 2011 I have been walked through this series. It is a good introduction to the world of assembly language. Thank you for your hardworking and contribution to the world of computer security. on Tue 17 May 2011 Thanks a lot for making this video series!
You have a very good teaching style and you move along in the material at the right pace. I will definitely be staying tuned. on Mon 23 May 2011 Great videoseries. Looking forward to seeing more interesting videos from you.
on Mon 13 Jun 2011 This whole series has been a good refresher, and this video in particular was very interesting to me, in that it has helped me better understand the C to asm connection. Thanks much for making these. on Sun 19 Jun 2011 I really, really, appreciate this series. However, you've asked for constructive feedback and commentary, so I'll pose what comes to mind. Why are you using AT&T syntax when the standard seems to be Intel syntax (and GAS supports Intel syntax just fine)? Also, why did you choose to use GAS versus something like NASM, since GAS been been designed specifically for the GCC back-end, and not really as a standard for normal products.
I can see that, having been exposed to GAS (and AT&T syntax), learning another flavor of assembly would be relatively easy, but I think NASM is a better start for most people. Or at least Intel syntax, since that's what most others use. on Wed 06 Jul 2011 Thank you for this!
I finally understand these underlying concepts because of this series! Keep up the fantastic work, I really love what your doing. on Fri 08 Jul 2011 As always!
Another great movie! Thank you Vivek!. on Sat 09 Jul 2011 My mind is blown.
on Sat 16 Jul 2011 awesome work.more concept in this video.little confusion. Any how great video vivek.thanks a lot.
on Tue 19 Jul 2011 fiuuuuuu this last one was intense:) i have to digest it, i watched all videos in two days, need to review. Thank you Vivek, great job.
on Fri 28 Oct 2011 Great Series!!! Thank you so much!. on Wed 30 Nov 2011 Vivek, Excellent video series. Your clear and easy to follow approach is very effective in learning. One minor item I would like to clarify/point out. There seems to be an error in the slides showing the stack contents, corresponding to the example function. Shouldnt the sequence be: 10 20 Ret Old-EBP.
Instead of: 20 10 Ret Old-EBP. Thanks & Regards. on Mon 12 Dec 2011 These tutorials have been great Vivek! The hands on experience works really good. Is there any exercises one can do get all the information to stay:)?
Hope to see more soon!. on Sun 25 Dec 2011 @maximus Actually, the slides are correct. When you pass arguments to a function in assembly, you push them in the reverse order. Because of that, when you want to do: function(a, b); //in C, for example You are doing: push b push a in assembly.
I hope I made you understand. on Tue 27 Dec 2011 One of the best tutorial series I've ever seen.(not just for asm).was probably a little too slow (in the middle of the series) for crash course learners - but was abs. Great overall!!. on Tue 27 Dec 2011 I just went through all of these videos and wanted to leave my comment until the end: You rock.
I've heard of people complain about how assembly is so hard to learn that it deterred me from even trying. But going through your tutorials, I don't know what they are complaining about because I feel like I know so much about assembly right now. I'm going to share this link with all of my old CS friends at the University of Chicago.
on Tue 17 Jan 2012 Mr Vivek, Assembly owes you too much beyond imaginations! Thanks a lot for your tutorials, i really enjoyed and hope u keep up this good works and makes more videos!. on Sat 11 Feb 2012 Thanks again Vivek! Another awesome series with a ton of easy to understand information! I am officially addicted to securitytube lol!
I was wondering if you had any plans on adding to this series at all and delving any deeper into assembly? I'd like to learn more about working with firmware and writing assembly code to hack LED displays, mechanical outputs, or other simple electronics. Would this be something you would be interested in elaborating on?
One way or another thank you very much for taking the time to create all the videos, primers, and guides on this site. It is indispensable for anyone getting into IT security or hacking for fun! I look forward to many more videos from you in the future!. on Sat 17 Mar 2012 Today,I realize Assembly programming is not so tuff. on Sun 25 Mar 2012 Followed the entire series. Very informative and I learned a lot.
No real suggestions for improvement are needed. on Sat 07 Jul 2012 Thanks Vivek. Simple and very effective tutorials (part1-part11). If you can improve the screen clarity, esp, when you are running the code.it would be better. on Thu 26 Jul 2012 A great video series.
Thank u so much Vivek!:) I studied this tutorial using a 64bit machine. I solved the problem of the instructions like pushl etc assembling and linking with 32bit directives. Eg: 'as -32 -o myprog.o myprog.s' and for the linker 'ld -m elfi386 -o myprog myprog.o' I did that in order to reproduce correctly the examples on my machine. So thx again Vivek!. on Tue 14 Aug 2012 A wonderful series:-).
on Thu 30 Aug 2012 This is a great series and it's very helpful to me. I am studying buffer overflows and this series was a good starting point for me. on Fri 14 Sep 2012 Vivek, Great series of videos!!! Its very hard to find people like you with an open heart and mind, that is open to share knowledge. If I can help on anything just let me know. Thanks a lot.
on Mon 24 Sep 2012 Love the videos! They've been great.
Could you please make some cheat sheets for your future videos. It's quite hard and frustrating having to look through all the videos to find one command/solution to your problem.
on Wed 17 Oct 2012 This was a greate Linux Assembly Megaprimer. Thank you very much vivek for your time and dedication. Cheers. on Sat 05 Jan 2013 thank you vivek sir, i have learned alot of intersting things,and your tutorials are amazing. Mostly i like the linux assembly and buffer overflow. on Thu 11 Apr 2013 great learning in great way.thank you very much.!!!.
on Wed 22 May 2013 Great teaching style! I've enjoyed all of your videos, and they've gotten me interested in Assembly - which is no small feat!
The only thing I've run into as a beginner that caused a bit of trouble was: it seems that most of the code that I see is in Intel notation; though, because the differences are somewhat minor, it wasn't a huge deal. I'm going onto buffer overflow and windows asm now - thank you for these!.
on Wed 05 Jun 2013 makes me feel as if I understand the garbage collection and how variables are handles in high level languages. on Fri 21 Jun 2013 Another superb video. The Function3 program would not compile for me. I got the following errors when I ran 'as -ggstabs -o Function3.o Function3.s' Function3.s:13:Error: invalid instruction suffix for 'push' Function3.s:25:Error: invalid instruction suffix for 'pop' Function3.s:33:Error: invalid instruction suffix for 'push' Function3.s:37:Error: invalid instruction suffix for 'push' It must be because I have a 64 bit CPU. I will investigate this and try to see if I can figure out the appropriate fixes. on Sat 22 Jun 2013 Okay. I did the following and the program worked for me as -32 -ggstabs -o Function3.o Function3.s ld -m elfi386 -o Function3 Function3.o./Function3 Thanks for the great video.