2020. 2. 7. 10:59ㆍ카테고리 없음
Open Preferencens → Theme, then select Glassy.Designed by Rocco Gallo. Download SLT Glassy for Android, PC / Mac / Windows 7,8,10. I know the Mac has a glassy screen which can cause glare - but I can. I have a 27' i7 iMac calibrated using eye 1 display and print to an.
PC, Mac, Tablet and Smartphone Control of NexStar Telescopes It is first important to understand that as the NexStar system evolved, three different control protocols were introduced. The first NexStars on the market were the original NexStar 5/8 sold from 1999 to mid 2002. These scopes had a silver optical tube and no connector ports on the top of the mount. They also have a control protocol unique to them, so if a software does not state specifically that it is compatible with this mount, it most likely will not communicate.
Next on the market were the NexStar GTs in 2000. The original hand control can be identified by a lack of the alignment option named Two Star Align. The original hand control had a slight change to the control protocol from the NexStar 5/8 and thus introduced the second unique protocol. There are very few software package compatible with this hand control. With the advent of the NexStar GPS series in 2001, Celestron introduced what would become their final (up to this time) control protocol.
The NexStar GTs received a hand control update in 2001, identifiable by the addition of the Two Star Align option, which used this same control protocol. The original NexStar 5/8 were never upgraded but were replaced by the NexStar 5i/8i which also used this new control protocol. All Celestron computerized mounts introduced since then also use this control protocol. Additional Info Software/Apps Compatible with Celestron Telescopes Hand Control USB Cable USB Drivers Hand Control RS-232 Port Cable PC Port Cable Diagram by Larry McNish Depicting NexStar Cable/Port Connections CPWI - Software to Replace the Hand Control with a PC NexRemote - Software to Replace the Hand Control with a PC Programming for NexStar Controlled Telescopes - Documentation and Examples Most of the information you find here is the result of my work on NexStar Observer List, a PC control program for all models of NexStar scopes. You can learn more and download your free copy. Software Settings So, when configuring your external software/app, if it requires the selection of telescope type, look first for your specific model (NexStar SLT, CPC, etc.).
If your model is not available, try NexStar GPS or CPC. If Celestron is the only option, select that. Feel free to experiment, but be ready to press any of the arrow buttons on the hand control if the mount seems to be slewing out of control and it looks like the optical tube might strike the mount. Wired Connections PC and Mac software generally communicate with the scope via the port on the bottom of the hand control. Current hand controls (manufactured since April 2016) have a USB port while older hand controls have an RS-232 port (looks like a phone jack). For more information about the various ports and connectors on your scope, visit the Odds and Ends section of this web site. Wired Connections for USB Hand Controls Hand controls manufactured since April 2016 have a mini-USB port on the bottom of the hand control.
The correct cable to connect to this port is described in the link 'Hand Control USB Cable' above. This port is actually a connection to a USB to serial adapter inside the hand control.
As such, once you connect to it, your computer will have a serial port that your astronomy software will interface with. Windows, Mac and Linux will all require a driver to create this serial port. See the link 'USB Drivers' above.
Once the driver is installed, a serial port, designated by a number, will be present on your computer. Configure your astronomy software to connect to this port.
At this time, I know of no method of making a wired connection between a table/smartphone and the USB hand control. Wired Connections for RS-232 Hand Controls Hand controls manufactured prior to April 2016 have an RS-232 port on the bottom of the hand control.
This is what is known as a 'serial' port connection. The correct cable to connect to this port is described in the link 'Hand Control RS-232 Port Cable' above.
If your PC/Mac does not have a serial port (serial ports are very rare with today's laptop/notebook computers) you will also need some sort of adapter. The one you will most likely use, is a USB to serial adapter ($30 to $40).
Most computer stores stock USB to serial adapters but not all work well with Celestron's scopes. I recommend you purchase Celestron's own USB to serial adapter (Celestron part number 18775) or an adapter that specifies it uses either a 'Prolific' or 'FTDI' chipset. Once you connect your USB adapter, a serial port, designated by a number, will be present on your computer. Configure your astronomy software to connect to this port. Wired connections to a tablet or smartphone are pretty much limited to Simulation Curriculum's and their SkySafari application.
This adapter is only compatible with specific iPhones, iPods and iPads. See their website for more details. Before smartphones, many people owned a PDA ('personal digital assistant', Palm Pilot, Pocket PC). If you have one stuffed in a drawer somewhere and want to try it out, PDAs require a serial 'sync' cable or a serial port CF card which is used to connect to the Hand Control RS-232 Port Cable. When using a CF card, the standard hand control RS-232 port cable is used.
When using a serial 'sync' cable, you will need a null modem and gender changer to use the hand control RS-232 port cable or a custom cable. Details of these cables are explained in the link 'Hand Control RS-232 Port Cable' above. Be sure to check out Larry McNish's diagram linked above for various cable connections to the RS-232 hand control. Wireless Connections Wireless control takes two basic flavors - Bluetooth and WiFi. Bluetooth Bluetooth RS-232 serial adapters connected to the RS-232 port on the bottom of the hand control (the serial port hand controls, not the newer USB hand controls) take the place of the standard control cable and can work with a wide variety of software/apps. There are several generic adapters on the market for $40-$60 dollars though they are not designed specifically for this purpose and some may simply not work.
But, since Bluetooth is supported by Windows, Mac and Android devices, this is a very attractive option. (I am unaware of any iOS/iPhone/iPad app that communicates with serial ports, but the WiFi option is available for iOS.) Essentially, the Bluetooth adapter presents itself to your computer/tablet/smartphone as a serial port. Thus, any astronomy software or app that can communicate with a serial port (those designed for the standard cable connection) can potentially use this configuration. If you decide you would like to experiment with Bluetooth adapters, you will want your Hand Control RS-232 Port Cable to be fairly short to allow the adapter to hang from the bottom of the hand control. Also be sure the adapter has a power source that works well for this purpose, such as an internal battery.
Slt Glassy For Mac Download
There is one Bluetooth adapter designed specifically for telescope control: Simulation Curriculum's. SkyBT is an adapter specifically designed for Android which will also work with their software products for the Mac. This option is tested with their SkySafari software but may work with other software. WiFi The second method of wireless control uses a WiFi connection similar to your home router or the Internet service at your local coffee shop. WiFi adapters for your scope are only compatible with a limited selection of software/apps. There are a few possibilities in this arena. The first is Celestron's WiFi solution.
The NexStar Evolution and the Astro Fi scopes have built-in WiFi. Celestron sells their (part # 93973) which is compatible with many of their other scopes - check their website to see if yours is supported. The SkyPortal WiFi Module plugs into an Aux jack on the scope and may require an 'Aux splitter' (also available from Celestron - part number 93973). In fact, I generally use the splitter as an extender on most mounts to allow the WiFi module to hang loose rather than providing a hook for things to get caught on. The Evolution, Astro Fi and SkyPortal WiFi Module are only compatible with the SkySafari and SkyPortal apps on Android and iOS. This is a unique solution as SkyPortal/SkySafari and your smartphone or tablet completely take the place of the physical hand control - you actually perform the alignment and all further operations inside the app itself. The only things similar are NexRemote and CPWI (see the links in the top, right of the page) which take the place of the physical hand control and run on a Windows PC.
Second, Simulation Curriculum offers. SkyFi III connects to either the RS-232 port on the bottom of the serial hand controls or the USB port on the bottom of the newer hand controls - check their website for telescope compatibility. SkyFi III is compatible with SkySafari on Android/iOS and SkySafari and Starry Night on Mac/Windows. Next, Software Bisque supports connections from their software, TheSkyX, with a device named 'WiSnap WiFi to RS232 Adapter'. Documentation on the use of TheSky is. The device doesn't seem to be available at their website but can be purchase from the manufacturer -. Most other Windows software should be able to connect via the WiSnap using AstroGeeks' COM2TCP software though configuring the adapter and COM2TCP could be a significant hurdle.
Finally, allow WiFi connections from Android, iOS, Mac and Windows devices to any of the serial port hand controls (not the newer USB hand controls). On Android and iOS, connections may be limited to SkySafari, though other software may work. On Mac and Windows computers, any software that can communicate via a wired serial connection should work fine. Putting It All Together With SkySafari using the WiFi connection method, SkyPortal, NexRemote or CPWI, you will first perform an alignment in the software/app itself. For all other software, you must first perform a regular alignment with the physical hand control before attempting to control the scope with the external software/app. Start your astronomy software and the computer should be ready to communicate with your telescope.
Some programs have a menu item or toolbar button to establish communication while other programs are ready to talk immediately after starting; refer to the documentation for your program if this is not readily apparent. The software/app may require some configuration settings such as setting the type of scope and the communication port the scope is connected to. A good test for communication is to direct your program to retrieve the telescope's coordinates, or, if it is planetarium software, the crosshairs on the screen should follow the telescope as you slew around. The next test would be to use the program to direct the scope to GoTo an object. If the coordinates match within a few arcminutes, then all is working properly. If the telescope doesn't move at all, check the LCD panel on the hand control for a slew limit warning - the object you requested might be outside your established Slew Limits.
If things don't seem to be working as expected, refer to the 'troubleshooting' articles at the top of the page.
What screen is better for macbook pro glossy or anti glare? Hi i just want to buy a laptop the Mac book Pro for home personal use.
Slt Glassy For Macbook Pro
As well as maybe for school. I like the glossy screen because its all shiny and looks pretty. But i heard it has a lot of problems because people get headaches easily and the reflection of the background is really annoying. I'm not sure about the anti glare but people say thats better because color is more real and its simple to use. I'm not sure which one to go for. I don't like the white outline i prefer black one but with the anti glare there is no black outline. Can anyone please tell me pros and cons of each and maybe help me make my decision.
I went to store i checked anti glare. They didn't have any glossy one they only had the regular ones but i didn't seem to have problem with it but i'm not to sure. Asked by fn from Burnaby.
May 16, 2011. Best Answer: It depends on what you are using it for. One clue is in the fact that matt screens are only available at higher resolutions. They are generally targeted at the professional market. Glossy screens look nicer. The blacks are deeper and the colours richer. Matt screens look a little duller, but give a truer representation of the actual colour, and are arguably easier to look at for extended periods, since your eyes don't try to see through the image to the reflection underneath.
With a matt screen you also have the issue of little bits of dust collecting at the bottom of the bezel. It totally comes down to personal choice, but in general I would suggest that you buy a matt screen if you fit the following categories:. A photoshop pro who needs to see the real colour of things. A coder, staring at a dark screen.
A video editor, you're looking at this thing a lot. Buy a glossy screen if you are a casual user, you just want the web, e-mail, photos and video to look as nice as possible. The only way to really tell though is to try. Pop into your local Apple store and look at the two of them running side by side. After a few minutes, you'll know. Answered by Nicholas J from Brighton. Dec 13, 2011.
You're going to regret getting a glossy screen. Yes, it's fancy schmancy looking, but there's too many drawbacks. Working outdoors in sunlight is definitely out of the question, but inside use will be affected by things such as window and lamp locations. The wrong type of lighting will have you working with a towel draped over your head and the screen. While the glossy is easier to keep clean, it is also easier to crack. I've had an anti-glare screen for 6 years now.
The colors continue to look brilliant and a monthly cleaning with a non-alcohol based spray and micro fiber cloth has kept it looking new. I have an iPad 2 with a glossy screen. It looks beautiful, and though I love it, once I take it outdoors, it is basically useless. You can't see anything on the screen until you find a well shaded area in which to stand. Save yourself the headaches (I'm speaking literal headaches), and the regrets, and cough up the extra cash for an anti-glare macbook pro. Answered by Donna M H from Lake Zurich.
May 23, 2012. I just bought a macbook pro and i was going through the same thing. I heard all these bad things about the glossy screen, but now that i've had the glossy screen for almost a week now i can say i dont regret my decision:) the reflections are not bad at all because the screen is so bright and also if you are going to be browsing on the internet most of the time, most of the pages are white so you cannot see any reflection. I use mine at home with normal lighting situations like a lamp, overhead lighting, little sun coming through window, and i have no problems with the screen. Maybe it's just the way my computer is positioned but right now there is light directly above me and it's no problem. The lighting in the apple store makes it look really reflective because it is realllly bright in there. I haven't used this outside though so i dont know how it looks outside.
Slt Glassy For Machines
But games, videos, and pictures look really beautiful and vivid on this screen. It does not hurt my eyes even when staring at it for a long time. Hope this helps to you or someone else. Answered by Hayley T from Memphis. Jun 4, 2011. As an owner of both a 2010 15' Macbook Pro w/ Glossy and 2011 15' Macbook Pro w/ Anti-Glare I can definitely say my experience with the Anti-Glare screen is well worth the extra cost.
But then again, if you buy refurbished like I did the cost for a MBP w/ anti-glare is comparable to a new base model glossy MBP. The glare from the glossy screen is obtrusive in most environments, almost to the point where your back has to be against the wall to be able to use your Macbook Pro.
The glossy screen does make colors pop more, but the contrast on the anti-glare is nothing to sneeze at either, esp. With some color calibration in System Preferences. Why are you so worried about the outline? Your eye focuses on the screen, no matter what. The anti-glare not only improves visibility, you also gain screen real estate. 1650x1050 on anti-glare vs.
1440x900 on glossy. If I had the choice though and unlimited funds, I'd just buy the Retina MBP but I'm holding out for the 2nd generation to see how Apple responds to consumers. Answered by Stephen B from Redondo Beach. Jul 19, 2012.
I bought a Macbook Pro 17 inch dual core duo 2.8 Ghz with the Antiglare screen about a year and a half ago. I typically trade up to a better machine every few years to stay somewhat current with the processor speed and retain value in my equipment.
I have reluctantly done so with this current machine simply because I think that the high resolution anti-glare screen is a better choice for all uses and in the end I think you'll be better off with the anti-glare screen if eye strain concerns you. Something that looks pretty but compromises you visual acuity doesn't seem like a reasonable trade off for usability. In following the value of this machine after about a 2 years of depreciation this machine seems to still hold it value strong. I am not so sure I'll want to let this machine go anytime soon simply because the anti-glare screen is easier on the eyes. I use it as a desktop replacement so carrying it around is not a concern. Good luck with your shopping.
Answered by Michael M from Bloomfield. Jul 24, 2012. Don't get the glossy screen!
It is useless, i'm a graphic designer and have a new 27' iMac which you can only get with a glossy screen. It just picks up all the reflections in the office a bit like looking in a mirror all day. I think it strains your eyes more and its no good for photo or colour re-touching. Its a shame as the iMac is really good, I wish they at least had the option of an anti glare screen for the iMac. How many flat screen TVs do you see with a glossy screen??.
Answered by Stephen W. Sep 25, 2012. I worked with an antiglare screen on my old MacBook Pro for years. Never knew there was anything different. But when I had to get a new one, I found a used version with a glossy screen and was very impressed. It sure is sleek and beautiful.
The only thing is that every time I go to use it, I am startled by this image of an older lady in the glass. Not good, esp since this screen seems exaggerate the wrinkles. Even my mirror doesn't show them like this. The reflection even haunts me when the background screen is white, try as I might not to notice that lady staring through the ages and the pages. Word to the wise: If you're over 40, think twice before getting glossy or you, too, may have a familiar-looking older stranger gazing at you. Answered by Maria G from San Francisco.
Sep 9, 2013. I'm going to reply to this even though I imagine the questioner has long since made a decision as this thread is one of the first items up in a Google search on the topic. I'm just switching from a 2008 MacBook Pro with a glossy screen running at 1440x900 to a new (early 2013) MacBook Pro with a anti-glare screen running at the higher resolution (not Retina). I've lived with a glossy screen for 5 years. The depth of blacks is great, the glass is easy to clean and I much prefer the black border round the screen to the 'classsic' (ie less good) aluminium (or aluminum) surround with the matt screen. However this was completely outweighed for me by the pain of the reflections on the glossy screen. I've had to rearranged my office so the window is not behind me, for example, because of the distraction of seeing through the reflections.
I've only just started with the new machine but already prefer the matt screen. Get it if you can afford it, I'd say (and think that it comes with extra screen resolution!). Answered by Jeremy M. Apr 17, 2013.